The Evolution of Mutual Benefit in China’s Foreign Aid Policy

Authors

  • Min ZHANG Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, Radboud Social Cultural Research at the Radboud University
  • Lau SCHULPEN Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, Radboud Social Cultural Research at the Radboud University
  • Dirk-Jan KOCH Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Keywords:

: Foreign aid, mutual benefit, ‘Eight Principles’, Four Principles, Foreign Aid White Paper, China

Abstract

Explicitly stating that its aid giving is based on the principle of mutual benefit is a distinctive feature of China’s foreign aid. How the mutual benefit principle is interpreted in China’s aid policy and why it remains perhaps the most durable aid principle over time is worth investigating. By comprehensively reviewing Chinese policy briefs and reports, white papers, government documents and speeches, this article finds that while mutual benefit has been a basic principle, the Chinese government’s statement and its role in the aid policy has continuously varied over the years. During Mao’s period, the mutual benefit was introduced as a basic principle but
its importance was limited due to the country’s policy statement indicating more the beneficiaries’ benefit. Then after the Reform and Opening policy in 1978, mutual benefit moved to the centre of China’s aid policy statement. Following the turn of the new century, particularly after 2011, China’s aid policy again pays more attention to recipient interest, and the importance of stressing mutual benefit decreased. The flexible use of mutual benefit is an important characteristic while it has remained a central element. Additionally, because self-interest is an integral part of mutual benefit, it fits with China’s pragmatic thinking on foreign aid, legitimizes the goal of China pursuing economic interests, softens the tone of China pursuing its political interests and to some extent alleviates the domestic critics on China’s aid relations. The main conclusion is that Chinese aid would benefit from more conceptual clarity with respect to mutual benefit and a more stable application over time.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Min ZHANG, Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, Radboud Social Cultural Research at the Radboud University

Dr. Min Zhang (corresponding author) is a PhD fellow in Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, Radboud Social Cultural Research at the Radboud University. She was awarded a PhD by China University of Political Science and Law in International Relations studies and is currently pursuing her second PhD
in international development studies. Her main research interests are international development assistance as well as China’s foreign policy and practice. She can be reached at <min.zhang@ru.nl>, <minzhangru@outlook.com>. Postal Address: P.O. Box 9014, 6500 HE Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Phone: +31 6 24569023 

 

 

Lau SCHULPEN, Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, Radboud Social Cultural Research at the Radboud University

Dr. Lau Schulpen is Assistant Professor at Cultural Anthropology and Development Studies, Radboud Social Cultural Research at the Radboud University. His main research interests are international development assistance as well as private development initiatives. He can be reached at https://www.ru.nl/english/people/schulpen-l/>

 

 

Dirk-Jan KOCH, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Prof. Dr. Dirk-Jan Koch, Radboud University Nijmegen is Special Professor of International Trade and Development Cooperation and Chief Science Officer of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Netherlands. He can be reached at <https://www.ru.nl/caos/vm/koch/>.

 

 

Downloads

Published

30-06-2022