COMBATING CLIMATE CHANGE IN CAMBODIA: GREENWASHING OR REALITY?
Main Article Content
Abstract
From wildfires in Bolivia, floods, and mudslides in South Africa, Nepal, and Myanmar, to heatwaves in Australia and Europe, the impact of climate change is felt globally but in unequal measures, as developing and least developed countries suffer the most devastating impacts despite being the least contributors. As a result, climate change is center stage because countries and their governments, organisations as well as multinationals are battling to contain its effects. Through the Nationally Determined Contributions of the Paris Agreement, countries pledged to mitigate climate change in their capacities. However, some of these contributions are overly ambitious for poor countries like Cambodia measuring it against their national capacities. Therefore, this paper investigates Cambodia’s official position on climate change vis-à-vis its current environmental practices, mitigation policies, and strategies by analysing three major climate change amplifiers – waste, deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions to determine whether it is the environmentally friendly country it portrays itself to be internationally or simply greenwashing. This paper merges both qualitative content and document analyses of official policy documents and agreements, reports, data, and publications of major climate change stakeholders in Cambodia. By in-depth analysis, it is established that Cambodia shows commitment to combating climate change, however, with current environmental practices and policy implementation, Cambodia moves towards solving the pressing issues of hunger and poverty with economic growth and development as a priority before consideration for the climate and environment. On this basis, it is recommended that the least developed countries set and maintain realistic climate goals and continue to receive external support from developed countries with monitoring and evaluating systems established to be up to par in the fulfilment of global agendas such as Agenda 2030.
Keywords: greenwashing, climate change, El Niño, climate action, Cambodia, climate justice
Downloads
Article Details
JATI PUBLICATION ETHICS & PUBLICATION MALPRACTICE STATEMENT:
These guidelines are fully consistent with the COPE Principles of Transparency and Best Practice Guidelines and the COPE Code of Conduct (https://publicationethics.org).
We encourage the best standards of publication ethics and take all possible principles of transparency and measures against publication malpractices. The Department of Southeast Asian Studies, as the publisher, plays its role of guardianship over all processes of publishing seriously, and we perform our ethical and other tasks.
- General duties and responsibilities of editors
Editors should be accountable for everything published in their journals. This means the editors should strive to meet the needs of readers and authors; constantly improve their journal; have processes in place to assure the quality of the material they publish; champion freedom of expression; maintain the integrity of the academic record; preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards; and always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed. In addition to these general duties, the editors accept the obligation to apply best will and practice to cope with the following responsibilities: - Editorial Board
Will generate editorial board from recognized experts in the field. The editor will provide full names and affiliations of the members and updated contact information for the editorial office on the journal webpage. - Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions, and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. - Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors should follow the format of reporting the original research with accurate data gathered. The author should include sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. It is unacceptable if the author performs malpractices in the paper. - Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have produced original articles and must appropriately cite or quote if the authors have used the work and words of others. - Concurrent Publication
It is ethical and acceptable for an author to submit or publish the same research or manuscripts in more than one journal or primary publication. - Acknowledging the Sources
Authors should cite properly publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. - Paper authorship
Those who have contributed significantly to the paper should be named as an author and co-authors. Those who have participated in the aspects of the research should be listed as contributors. All co-authors should have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. - Announcement and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should include the financier or grant giver if the manuscript or research is financed by the research grant or any financial support body. - Errors in published works
The author is responsible for communicating and co-operating with the editor to retract or correct the paper when a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work. - Publication decisions
The editor should decide which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. - Peer review process
All journal's content (articles) are subjected to a double-blind, peer-review process. Articles are first reviewed by editors and may be rejected because it is not dealing with the subject matter. Articles that are found suitable for review are then sent to two experts who are unknown to each other in the field of the paper.
Reviewers are asked to classify the paper as publishable, with amendments and improvements, or rejected. Reviewer's evaluations usually include what to do with the article. The author then sees the reviewer's comments.
Editors should be ready to justify any important points from the described process. Editors should not reverse decisions on publication. Editors should publish guidance to both authors and reviewers on everything expected of them. This guidance should be regularly updated and referred to or linked to this code. - Fair play
The editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Editors' decision to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based only on the paper's importance, originality and clarity, and the study's relevance to the journal's aim. - Digital Archiving
The editor will ensure digital access to the journal content by the University of Malaya Journal depository section at http://jati-dseas.um.edu.my and MyJournal at http://www.myjurnal.my/public/browse-journal-view.php?id=39. - Confidentiality
Editor and any editorial staff must keep confidential all information about the manuscript's submitted and review process to anyone except the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher. - Publication and Submission fee
Authors are freed from submission fees. Authors are required to pay the Article Processing Fee, RM300 or USD80. - Open Access Policy
The journal is freely available online. Authors must agree with this open access policy which enables unrestricted access and reuse of all published articles. The articles are published under the Creative Commons copyright license policy CC-BY. - Reporting standards
Authors of papers should present an accurate account of the work performed and an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the article. An article should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be identified as such. - Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works and if the authors have used the work and words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
References
AZoCleantech. (2008, August 28). Greenwashing, A Definition of What Greenwashing is, Examples of Greenwashing and How to Spot Greenwashing retrieved from https://www.azocleantech.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=109
Blue washing (2010, February 4). The New York Times. Retrieved from https://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/04/bluewashing/
Borg, L.F. (2011, December). Climate Change and Human Security in Cambodia . Cambodian Institute for Peace and Cooperation. Working Paper no. 46. Phnom Penh. Retrieved from http://www.cicp.org.kh/userfiles/file/Working%20Paper/CICP%20Working%20Paper%20No%2046_Climate%20Change%20and%20Human%20Security%20in%20Cambodia.pdf
Bowen, F. (2014). After Greenwashing: Symbolic Corporate Environmentalism and Society. United Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.
Cambodia Environmental Outlook (2009). Ministry of Environment, Cambodia. Retrieved from https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/8689/Cambodia_environment_outlook.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Cambodia Forest Cover 2016 (2018, March). REDD+ Ministry of Environment Cambodia retrieved from https://redd.unfccc.int/uploads/54_3_cambodia_forest_cover_resource__2016_english.pdf
Cambodia Methane Emissions (2012). The World Bank. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.METH.KT.CE?end=2012&locations=KH&start=2012&view=map
Cambodia: Country Environmental Profile (2012). Emission Database For Global Atmospheric Research of the European Union Delegation to Cambodia retrieved from http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/delegations/cambodia/documents/publications/country_env_profile_cam_april_2012_en.pdf
Cambodia UN REDD National Program Factsheet: 2011-2015 (n.d) United Nations Development Program retrieved from http://mptf.undp.org/factsheet/project/00076663
Chan, S. (2018, January 30). Three Cambodian Cities Named Among The Cleanest In ASEAN. Khmer Times. Retrieved from https://www.khmertimeskh.com/50105168/three-cambodian-cities-named-among-the-cleanest-in-asean/
Communication on Progress: Ezecom (2015-2017) n.d. UN Global Compact retrieved from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop/create-and-submit/active/357591
Connor, L. (2017, June 25). What Will Become of Cambodia’s Endangered Tuk-Tuk Drivers? South China Morning Post. Retrieved from https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/society/article/2097978/what-will-become-cambodias-endangered-tuk-tuk-drivers
Denney, L. (2016, May). Reforming Solid Waste in Phnom Penh. The Asia Foundation retrieved from https://asiafoundation.org/publication/reforming-solid-waste-management-phnom-penh/ or https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Working-Politically-and-Flexibly-to-Reform-Solid-Waste-Management-in-Phnom-Penh.pdf
Environment Health and Society. (2016, November 3). Cambodia Ministry of Mines and Energy. Retrieved from http://www.mme.gov.kh/en/article/282/Environment-Health-and-Society.html
Erickson-Davis, M. (2017, January 13). NASA Releases Images of Dramatic Deforestation in Cambodia. Mongabay. Retrieved from https://news.mongabay.com/2017/01/nasa-releases-images-of-dramatic-cambodia-deforestation/
Erickson-Davis, M. (2017, January 13). NASA releases images of dramatic deforestation in Cambodia. Mongabay. Retrieved from https://news.mongabay.com/2017/01/nasa-releases-images-of-dramatic-cambodia-deforestation/
Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research Cambodia (2017). European Union Delegation to Cambodia. European External Action Service retrieved from http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/booklet2017/countries/KHM.pdf
Environmental Index Results (2018). Environmental Performance Index. Yale University retrieved from at https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/epi-topline
Environmental Performance Index on Cambodia (2018) Yale University retrieved from https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/sites/default/files/2018-khm.pdf
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL). Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) at edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Fingas, J. (2017, October 17). Greenpeace blasts Amazon over poor environmental practices. Engadget. Retrieved from https://www.engadget.com/2017/10/17/greenpeace-blasts-amazon-over-poor-environmental-practices/
Forbes, L. C., and Jermier, J. (2012). The New Corporate Environmentalism. In Bansal, P. and Hoffman, A. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment, pp. 556–571. Oxford University Press.
Gas Emissions Data by Party: Cambodia (n.d). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) found at: http://di.unfccc.int/detailed_data_by_party
or https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1022cambodia.pdf
, https://unfccc.int/documents?f%5B0%5D=country%3A2004
Greenwash Fact Sheet (2001, March 22). Corpwatch. Retrieved from https://corpwatch.org/article/greenwash-fact-sheet
Greenwashing (n.d.). In Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary and Thesaurus Online Dictionary retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/greenwash
Greenwashing (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/greenwashing
Greenwashing (n.d.). In the English Oxford Living Dictionary (12th Edition) retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/greenwash
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P.V., Moore, R., et al. (2013). High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science 342 (15 November): 850–53. Available on-line from: http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest from Global Forest Watch on November 24, 2018. www.globalforestwatch.org
http://theterramarproject.org/dc-archive/bluewashing-is-the-new-greenwashing/
http://www.camclimate.org.kh/en/ccd/discussion-corner/dcc-structure.html
Intact Forest Landscapes 2000/2013 (n.d.). Greenpeace, University of Maryland, World Resources Institute and Transparent World. Accessed through Global Forest Watch on January 12, 2017 from www.globalforestwatch.org