AGRICULTURE TRANSITION AND WOMEN’S DECISION-MAKING POWER IN COFFEE-FARMING HOUSEHOLDS IN LAO PDR
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Lao government introduced a new period of economic liberalisation with the New Economic Mechanism (NEM) in 1986. The present study examines whether market liberalisation and women’s participation translated into changes in women’s decision-making power in the coffee growing region of the Bolaven Plateau in southern Lao PDR. While women have always been involved in coffee farming, their participation increased when the more labour-intensive arabica coffee plants were introduced to replace the less popular robusta variety in the region. Drawing on quantitative and qualitative data, the study examines gender decision-making within coffee-farming households. The findings show an increase in women’s participation in decision-making with the introduction of the arabica coffee plants; however, men still hold higher decision-making power in farming households. While the NEM has brought about economic growth and provided better livelihoods for coffee farmers, this has not necessarily translated into women’s empowerment. Economic growth is not enough to bring about gender equality, and there is still a need for specific policy interventions.
Downloads
Article Details
JATI PUBLICATION ETHICS & PUBLICATION MALPRACTICE STATEMENT:
These guidelines are fully consistent with the COPE Principles of Transparency and Best Practice Guidelines and the COPE Code of Conduct (https://publicationethics.org).
We encourage the best standards of publication ethics and take all possible principles of transparency and measures against publication malpractices. The Department of Southeast Asian Studies, as the publisher, plays its role of guardianship over all processes of publishing seriously, and we perform our ethical and other tasks.
- General duties and responsibilities of editors
Editors should be accountable for everything published in their journals. This means the editors should strive to meet the needs of readers and authors; constantly improve their journal; have processes in place to assure the quality of the material they publish; champion freedom of expression; maintain the integrity of the academic record; preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards; and always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed. In addition to these general duties, the editors accept the obligation to apply best will and practice to cope with the following responsibilities: - Editorial Board
Will generate editorial board from recognized experts in the field. The editor will provide full names and affiliations of the members and updated contact information for the editorial office on the journal webpage. - Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions, and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. - Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors should follow the format of reporting the original research with accurate data gathered. The author should include sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. It is unacceptable if the author performs malpractices in the paper. - Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have produced original articles and must appropriately cite or quote if the authors have used the work and words of others. - Concurrent Publication
It is ethical and acceptable for an author to submit or publish the same research or manuscripts in more than one journal or primary publication. - Acknowledging the Sources
Authors should cite properly publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. - Paper authorship
Those who have contributed significantly to the paper should be named as an author and co-authors. Those who have participated in the aspects of the research should be listed as contributors. All co-authors should have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. - Announcement and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should include the financier or grant giver if the manuscript or research is financed by the research grant or any financial support body. - Errors in published works
The author is responsible for communicating and co-operating with the editor to retract or correct the paper when a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work. - Publication decisions
The editor should decide which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. - Peer review process
All journal's content (articles) are subjected to a double-blind, peer-review process. Articles are first reviewed by editors and may be rejected because it is not dealing with the subject matter. Articles that are found suitable for review are then sent to two experts who are unknown to each other in the field of the paper.
Reviewers are asked to classify the paper as publishable, with amendments and improvements, or rejected. Reviewer's evaluations usually include what to do with the article. The author then sees the reviewer's comments.
Editors should be ready to justify any important points from the described process. Editors should not reverse decisions on publication. Editors should publish guidance to both authors and reviewers on everything expected of them. This guidance should be regularly updated and referred to or linked to this code. - Fair play
The editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Editors' decision to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based only on the paper's importance, originality and clarity, and the study's relevance to the journal's aim. - Digital Archiving
The editor will ensure digital access to the journal content by the University of Malaya Journal depository section at http://jati-dseas.um.edu.my and MyJournal at http://www.myjurnal.my/public/browse-journal-view.php?id=39. - Confidentiality
Editor and any editorial staff must keep confidential all information about the manuscript's submitted and review process to anyone except the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher. - Publication and Submission fee
Authors are freed from submission fees. Authors are required to pay the Article Processing Fee, RM300 or USD80. - Open Access Policy
The journal is freely available online. Authors must agree with this open access policy which enables unrestricted access and reuse of all published articles. The articles are published under the Creative Commons copyright license policy CC-BY. - Reporting standards
Authors of papers should present an accurate account of the work performed and an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the article. An article should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be identified as such. - Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works and if the authors have used the work and words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
References
Akter, S., Rutsaert, P., Luis, J., Htwe, N. M., San, S. S., Raharjo, B., & Pustika, A. (2017). Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equity in Agriculture: A Different Perspective from Southeast Asia. Food Policy, 69, 270-279. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.05.003
Alkire, S., Meinzen-Dick, R., Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A., Seymour, G., & Vaz, A. (2013). The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index. World Development, 52, 71-91. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.06.007
Anik, A. R., & Rahman, S. (2020). Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture: Level, Inequality, Progress, and Impact on Productivity and Efficiency. The Journal of Development Studies, 57(6), 930-948. doi:10.1080/00220388.2020.1817393
Asadullah, M. N., & Kambhampati, U. (2021). Feminization of Farming, Food Security and Female Empowerment. Global Food Security, 29. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100532
Asian Development Bank. (2001). Participatory Poverty Assessment. Lao PDR. State Planning Committee National Statistic Center Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from http://lad.nafri.org.la/fulltext/372-0.pdf
Asian Development Bank and the World Bank. (2012). Country Gender Assessment for LAO PDR-Reducing Vulnerability and Increasing Opportunity. Mandaluyong City, Philippines and Washington, D.C., USA: Asian Development Bank and The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Booth, A. (2016). Women, Work and the Family: Is Southeast Asia Different? Economic History of Developing Regions, 31(1), 167-197. doi:10.1080/20780389.2015.1132624
CEDAW. (2013). Combined Sixth and Seventh Periodic Report on the Implementation of Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Vientiane: United Nations (UN).
CEDAW. (2018). List of Issues in Relation to the Combined Eighth and Ninth Periodic Reports of the Lao People's Democratic Republic. Vientiane: United Nation (UN). Retrieved from https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Documents/1_Global/CEDAW_C_71_1_27519_E.pdf
Colfer, C. J. P., Daro Minarchek, R., Cairns, M., Aier, A., Doolittle, A., Mashman, V., . . . Van Esterik, P. (2015). Gender Analysis: Shifting Cultivation and Indigenous People. In M. F. Cairns (Ed.), Shifting Cultivation and Environmental Change: Indigenous People, Agriculture and Forest Conservation (pp. 920-957). Abingdon: Routledge.
Dollar, D., & Gatti, R. (1999). Gender Inequality, Income, and Growth: Are Good Times Good for Women? (Vol. 1). Washington, DC.: Development Research Group, The World Bank.
Doss, C. R., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2020). Understanding Rural Household Behavior: Beyond Boserup and Becker. Agricultural Economics, 51(1), 47-58. doi:10.1111/agec.12540
Douangphachanh, M. (2020). Gender Division of Labour and Women's Decision-making Power in Coffee Farming Household in Southern Laos (Doctoral dissertation), Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Malaya, Malaysia,
Duflo, E. (2012). Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic literature, 50(4), 1051-1079.
Evans, G. (1990). Lao Peasants under Socialism (1st ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Evans, G. (1999). Ethnic Change in the Northern Highlands of Laos. In G. Evans (Ed.), Laos: Culture Society. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.
Faming, M. (2018). Big (Wo)man Politics: Gender Equality in Laos? Asian Anthropology, 17(2), 116-134. doi:10.1080/1683478X.2018.1463595
Fartyal, S., & Rathore, S. (2016). Gender Differences in Decision Making Pattern of Hill Vegetables Growers. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 14(2), 131-134.
Food and Agriculture Organisation. (2017). Laos at a Glance. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/laos/fao-in-laos/laos-at-a-glance/en/
Galindo, J., Sallée, B., Manivong, P., Mahavong, P., David, A., Homevongsa, V., . . . Guitet, C. (2007). Participative Analysis of Coffee Supply Chain in Lao PDR. Retrieved from https://laocoffeeorg.files.wordpress.com/2018/06/participative-analysis-of-the-coffee-supply-chain-in-laos-pcadr-2007.pdf
Gender Resource Information & Development Center. (2005). Lao PDR Gender Profile. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTLAOPRD/Resources/Lao-Gender-Report-2005.pdf
Hamid, W., Khan, T. A., & Jahangir, M. S. (2021). Autonomy and Decision-making Ability among Gujjar Women of Kashmir: A Study of Khan Sahib Tehsil in District Budgam. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 28(1), 90-103. doi:10.1177/0971521520974869
Hazarika, B., & Goswami, K. (2016). Do Home-based Micro-entrepreneurial Earnings Empower Rural Women? Evidence from the Handloom Sector in Assam. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 22(3), 289-317. doi:10.1080/12259276.2016.1205376
Howland, O., Brockington, D., & Noe, C. (2020). Women’s Tears or Coffee Blight? Gender Dynamics and Livelihood Strategies in Contexts of Agricultural Transformation in Tanzania. Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 9(2), 171-196. doi:10.1177/2277976020925318
Ireson-Doolittle, C. (2004). The Lao: Gender, Power, and Livelihood. Boulder: Westview Press.
Ireson, C. (2018). Fields, Forest, and Family: Women's Work And Power in Rural Laos (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Joshi, K., Dash, H., & Gangwar, B. (2016). Exploring Gender Involvement in Agriculture Decision-making: A Case Study of Meerut District in Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Human Ecology, 54(1), 41-48. doi:10.1080/09709274.2016.11906985
Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435-464.
Kabeer, N. (2001). Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women’s Empowerment. In N. Kabeer (Ed.), Discussing Women’s Empowerment-Theory and Practice (pp. 17-54). Stockholm: Swedish International Development Agency.
Kabeer, N. (2016). Economic Pathways to Women’s Empowerment and Active Citizenship: What Does the Evidence from Bangladesh Tell Us? The Journal of Development Studies, 295-321.
Kabeer, N., & Natali, L. (2013). Gender Equality and Economic Growth: Is There a Win‐win? IDS Working Papers, 2013(417), 1-58.
Khouangvichit, D. (2010). Socio-Economic Transformation and Gender Relations in Lao PDR (Doctoral Disseration), Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Retrieved from www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:318827/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Khurana, S. (2015). Negotiating Responsibilities and Relationships: Power, Conflict, and Decision-making in Households of Informal Women Workers. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(3), 273-294. doi:10.1080/12259276.2015.1072942
Lai, W. T. (2011). Gender and Livelihoods: A Case Study of the Mah Meri and the Oil Palm Plantations of Carey Island. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 17(2), 66-95. doi:10.1080/12259276.2011.11666108
Lao Women Union. (1989). Status of women: Laos. Bangkok: UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific
Lokin, M., & Nutters, S. (2014). Fair Trade Matters! A Study on the Influence of Fair Trade Certification on Living Conditions of Coffee Farmers in Laos. Retrieved from https://laofab.org/document/download/2313
Manivong, V. (2014). Agrarian Transition in Lowland Southern Laos: Implications for Rural Livelihoods. (Doctoral disseration), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Matsushima, Y., & Vilaylack, C. (2005). Coffee Economy in the Lao PDR: A Review of Development under the Changing Trade Environment and Export Potentials. Retrieved from https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/11802832.pdf
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2010). Strategy for Agricultural Development 2011 to 2020. Sector Framework, Vision and Goals Agriculture and Forestry for Sustainable Development, Food and Income Security. Vientiane: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Retrieved from https://ali-sea.org/aliseaonlinelibrary-dashboard/get/file/Strategy-for-Agriculture-Development-2011-2020-Laos.pdf
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2014). Lao Census of Agriculture 2010/11: Analysis of Selected Themes. Vientiane: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/at767e/at767e.pdf
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2015). Agriculture Development Strategy to the year 2025 and Vision to 2030. Vientiane: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. Retrieved from https://www.maf.gov.la/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/MDS-2025-and-Vision-to-2030-Eng.pdf
Ministry of Planning and Investment. (2006). Five Year National Socio-economic Development Plan VI (2006-2010). Vientiane: Ministry of Planning and Investment. Retrieved from https://www.preventionweb.net/files/15958_6thnsedplaos.pdf
Ministry of Planning and Investment. (2011). Five Year National Socio-economic Development Plan VII (2011-2015). Vientiane: Ministry of Planning and Investment. Retrieved from https://www1.undp.org/content/dam/laopdr/docs/Reports%20and%20publications/LA_7th%20NSEDP_Eng.pdf
Ministry of Planning and Investment. (2016). Five Year National Socio-economic Development Plan VIII (2016-2020). Vientiane: Ministry of Planning and Investment. Retrieved from https://laopdr.un.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/2016_8th%20NSEDP_2016-2020_English.pdf
Minoo, A. (2014). The Emergence of Wealthy Farmers in the Coffee-planting Area of Southern Laos. Southeast Asian Studies [東南アジア研究], 51(2), 297-325.
Nahrgang, S. (2016, 31 March). Husbands’ and Wives’ Reports of Women’s Decision-making Autonomy and Their Association with Focused Antenatal Care Utilization: Empirical Evidence from Cambodia. Paper presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington DC., United States.
Nguyen, H., Mortensen, S., & Pravalprukskul, P. (2019). Pathways for Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture in South and Southeast Asia. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Phochanthilath, C. (2019). Gender Relations in Laos. (Doctoral dissertation), Southest Asian Studies, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Pimpa, N., Moore, T., Phouxay, K., Douangphachanh, M., & Sanesathid, O. (2016). How Mining Multinational Corporations Promote Women? Modus Operandi. Journal of Management Research, 8(2), 119-131. doi:10.5296/jmr.v8i2.9175
Quaye, W., Dowuona, S., Okai, M., & Dziedzoave, N. (2016). Gender Dimensions of Decision-making on Production Assets and Challenges Facing Women. Development in Practice, 26(1), 77-90. doi:10.1080/09614524.2016.1112364
Rao, S., & Kushwaha, S. (2016). Role of Income Generation Programme in Women Empowerment. SMS Journal of Enterpreneurship & Innovation, 2(2), 63-68. doi:10.21844/smsjei.v2i2.11147
Rice, W. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Journal Evolution, 43(1), 223-225.
Rigg, J. (2009). A Particular Place? Laos and Its Incorporation into the Development Mainstream. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(3), 703-721. doi:10.1068/a40260
Rigg, J. (2012). Living with Transition in Laos: Market Integration in Southeast Asia. Abingdon: Routledge.
Roberts, M. (2004). Assessing Participatory Action Research: A Case Study from the Lao PDR (Master's thesis), Ohio University, United States.
Roberts, M. (2011). Traditional Beliefs and Farmer Decision-making in the Uplands of Northern Lao PDR (Doctoral dissertation), University of Nevada, Reno, United States.
Sharma, N., Chander, M., Meena, H., & Verma, A. (2016). Decision Making Pattern and Economic Motivation of Women Dairy Farmers of Rajasthan - A Gender Perspective. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 15(4), 99-102.
Shaw, T., Das, A., & Dey, S. (2016). Role of Gender in Decision-making: A Study of Women Attached in Handloom Weaving. International Journal of Gender Studies in Developing Societies, 1(3), 278-298.
Sisouphanthong, B., Sousa, M. D., Gansberghe, D. v., Douangdy, S., Keomixay, S., Chamberlain, J., Wagenbuur, K. (2002). National Human Development Report 2001: Advancing Rural Development. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/lao_2001_en.pdf
Southichack, M. (2009). The Lao Coffee Economy: A New Growth Path on the Horizon? Honolulu: Intergro Inc.
Tiwari, M., & Tripathi, N. (2016). Decision Pattern Among Women Performing Agricultural Activities. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 14(3), 31-34.
Weeratunge, N., Joffre, O., Senaratna Sellamuttu, S., Bouahom, B., & Keophoxay, A. (2016). Gender and Household Decision-making in a Lao Village: Implications for Livelihoods in Hydropower Development. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(11), 1599-1614. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2016.1219319
Yusof, S. A. (2015). Household Decision-making in Malaysia: The Ethnic Dimension. Social Indicators Research, 124(1), 283-293. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0782-8